Trapped in the attention farm

Dave Winer:

Ever notice that mostly what people post on Twitter is designed to get attention for the author. I think that’s due to the award incentive of the system. Flow == more followers == power and prestige.

Yes. It’s the big and dangerous trap of Twitter, especially for journalists. Twitter increasingly rewards attention-seeking behaviour, rather than useful behaviour.


Online community dynamics change as the membership grows. In particular, most networks require increasing attention-seeking behaviour in order to get any attention at all.


Interesting that Pinterest is leading the way on this. People do not pay nearly enough attention to it.

Pinterest takes the lead in the fight against online misinformation


Dave Winer:

Discourse is not Twitter’s strength, not because of the thread structure, rather that it’s a write-only community of attention seekers 🔥


The victorious defeat of the open web

It just occurred to me that the prevalent idea that apps killed the open web is completely and utterly wrong. The open web is still there, it still works, and it still needs no-one’s permission before you can publish there. Sure, the vast majority of the attention is elsewhere, in siloed apps, but then it was in the glory days of the web, too.

Maybe that’s OK. Maybe that’s how it should be. And that’s maybe where those of us who enjoy something different, something alternative, something fun can build new and interesting things. We need new mechanisms to help people navigate these alleyways, and to connect with each other, as most of the old ones are gone or transformed. But that can be done.

Maybe, just maybe, the victory of the apps has handed us the blessing of being counter-cultural again. And that’s exciting.


OK. Let’s talk about that bloody egg — and why it does matter.

Yes, it’s come to that.


I love the neologism “memeocracy” to describe the impact of influencer culture in the attention economy. I love the impact of it significantly less.


Barbados, late 2011

I’ve just been pottering around editing some old photos, from our last pre-children holiday. Two days after I got back, my life changed forever in two ways: we agreed to buy a house, and I realised that my time at my old employer was up. I was figuring out what to do next, and so these photos have never had the attention they deserve.

I’m enjoying coming back to them with seven years' distance.

The still Caribbean Boating off Barbados Sunset over the villa's pool The wild, wild East coast

I used to shoot a lot more landscapes back then…


Such a lovely, simple concept:

Technology is no longer scarce, our attention is. Technology is breaking our attention. Tech should consume as little of our attention as possible, and only when necessary; that’s the core of calm technology.


The two basics of digital #journalism that too many people forget: Attention and Atomisation


Do you what I like about smart speakers? They just sit quietly, waiting to be called upon, while mobile phones behave like noisy, annoying insecure devices, constantly demanding your attention. Grow the heck up, phone.


I have to confess, I paid basically zero attention to the royal wedding in the build up to it. But seeing the royals give a hearty two fingers to the racists we’ve seen rise post-Brexit?


As long as Twitter rewards hoaxing with attention, it’s going to get ever less useful for breaking news.


Apple’s acquisition of Texture (a digital magazine subscription app) means we should probably be paying Apple News more attention than we are. But we should go in with our eyes open as to the downsides.


It's not our attention that's being monetised, it's our data

The Centre for Human Technology doesn’t want your attention:

What the Center identifies as the ‘monetization of attention’ is, actually, the extraction of personal data. (Curiously, they do not use the phrase ‘big data’, or ‘your personal data’ anywhere in their website text.) This attention (or, personal data) is extracted from our digital and analog behavior and then is used to profile and target us to sell us lies, misinformation, or worsen our depression by showing us advertising for make-up.


It only took three attempts to get the headline typo free on this.

Bring back the subs.


I am old enough to have learnt to not to blog every opinion that crosses my brainmeats.

I am clearly not old enough yet to be silent without drawing attention to the fact I’m being silent.


I am old enough to have learnt to not to blog every opinion that crosses my brainmeats.

I am clearly not old enough yet to be silent without drawing attention to the fact I’m being silent.


Not 100% sure I have their attention…


Centre of attention at @likemind